![]() While the dinosaurs are colorful and creative, our cast of characters and development of the plot is not so high and wonderful. What they can, and what I can complain about, is the characterization. The combination of computer graphics and animatronics were perfect. They're dangerous, unpredictable creatures with a taste for human flesh. They move fluid-like, behave like real animals, react like them, and although we have no idea what a real dinosaur behaved, the creatures on the film react just the way we want them to. The dinosaurs in the film are just as good, if not better, than the animals from the first film. However, "The Lost World: Jurassic Park" does pull itself off as a fairly good film for what it was meant to be: an elaborate and heart-pounding action thriller. And I do have to criticize it for a few flaws, which unfortunately, for it, are very important in a good film. When I was young, this was my favorite out all three films because it had the most dinosaurs and elaborate sequences in it. And I have, of course, seen the film numerous times. I myself have read Crichton's novel, upon which this film was based. And it is of no surprise to cinema-goers such as myself that a sequel would be released sooner or later, whether or not original novel author Michael Crichton wrote it in paper form first. ![]() The first film, "Jurassic Park" was an enormous commercial, and fairly good critical success worldwide.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |